To Share or Not to Share

The gray building behind the KFC in the photo above is a storage facility designed to protect artwork. It is climate-controlled, with emergency generators and state-of-the- art security, like iris scans. The art is protected, but nobody gets to see it. Do collectors have an obligation to share the art they own with others?

Do you see the gray building behind the KFC in the photo above? It’s a high-tech storage facility designed to protect artwork. But nobody gets to see the art stored inside. Should art collectors have to share the art they own with others?

Sometimes only certain people are allowed to view a collector’s art. Albert Barnes amassed an impressive private collection, including Henri Matisse’s iconic 1907 Red Madras Headdress, above. When the Barnes Foundation opened in 1922, Barnes dictated where and how his art should be displayed. He also forbade parties and strictly limited who could visit. Artists and factory workers were permitted—Barnes wanted to educate those who didn’t usually have access to art. Art critics and the wealthy usually were not allowed.

Following Barnes’s death in 1951, a series of lawsuits helped loosen restrictions. Works from the collection were allowed to be shown away from the original space for the first time. Eventually the foundation’s trustees approved a plan to move all the artworks to a new museum in Philadelphia built to house the collection. Today anyone can buy a ticket to visit. But was moving away from Barnes’s original vision the right decision?

Sometimes only certain people can view a collector’s art. Albert Barnes’s collection included a famous 1907 painting by Henri Matisse, Red Madras Headdress, above. When he opened the Barnes Foundation in 1922, he decided to limit visitors. Art critics and wealthy people were usually not welcome. But he allowed artists and factory workers to view his collection. He wanted to educate artists and people who didn’t usually have access to art.

After Barnes died in 1951, art from the collection was allowed to be shown in other places. Eventually, all the art was moved to a new museum in Philadelphia. Now anyone can buy a ticket and view Barnes’s collection. But was changing Barnes’s plan for his collection the right decision?

Don and Mera Rubell have a more welcoming attitude than Barnes did. The couple began acquiring contemporary art more than 50 years ago. They purchased their first work on installment, paying a little each week. Today they have one of the world’s largest private collections: more than 7,200 works by more than 1,000 artists. The Rubells continue to visit artists’ studios and acquire new works. The couple believes it’s important to support contemporary artists, like Chinese artist Liu Wei. The couple poses in front of the artist’s 2013 Liberation No. 1, above.

Eager to share their lovingly curated collection with the public, the Rubells transformed a former warehouse in Miami into a museum in 1993. More recently, they converted an abandoned school in Washington, D.C., into a 32,000-square-foot museum. It’s free for D.C. residents and reasonably priced for others.

What do you think? Do art collectors have a responsibility to share the art they own with the public? Why or why not?

Don and Mera Rubell started buying contemporary art more than 50 years ago. They made their first purchase with small weekly payments. Today they own one of the world’s largest private collections: over 7,200 works by more than 1,000 artists. They believe it’s important to support contemporary artists, like Chinese artist Liu Wei. The couple poses in front of the artist’s Liberation No. 1, above.

The Rubells were eager to share their collection with the public. They transformed a Miami warehouse into a museum in 1993. Recently, they transformed an abandoned school in Washington, D.C., into a 32,000-square-foot museum. It’s free for people who live in D.C.

Do you think art collectors have a responsibility to share the art they own with the public? Why or why not?